- 27 January 2012
- 0 Comments
- NIAC round-up
NYTimes: Israel doubtful that military strike would result in Iranian retaliation
The New York times reports that Israeli academics and intelligence officials are skeptical of the ferocity of Iranian retaliation tactics in the case of an Israeli strike and believe that possible measures, such as shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, would cause Iran to harm itself. This belief is based on an analysis of Iran’s interests and previous actions, as well as the many over exaggerated threats presented in the past by Iraq and Hezbollah. “A war is no picnic,” Defense Minister Ehud Barak told Israel Radio in November. But if Israel feels itself forced into action, the retaliation would be bearable, he said. “There will not be 100,000 dead or 10,000 dead or 1,000 dead. The state of Israel will not be destroyed.” (NY Times 01/27)
Oil industry see Iran sanctions benefitting China, hurting West
Despite sanctions, Iran will continue to sell oil at a similar volume, although the majority of exported oil will go to China. Being one of Iran’s only remaining customers, the Chinese will be able to bargain for a significantly reduced price on oil. The West is relying heavily on an increased output from Saudi Arabia to avoid a spike in oil prices, which would hurt an already deteriorating global economy. (Chicago Tribune 01/27)
U.S.-Israel joint missile defense drill now slated for October 2012
The largest-ever joint missile defense drill between the U.S. and Israel has been rescheduled for this Fall after news leaked that it had been suspended. The drill, in which several thousand U.S. military personnel will be stationed in Israel, has been perceived as a signal to the region of the U.S. and Israel’s unity and resolve regarding Iran. Auster Challenge’s abrupt cancellation two weeks ago fueled suspicions of a rift between the two countries in their approach to Iran, though U.S. and Israeli officials insisted it was due only to technical issues. (Business Insider 01/27)







