• 13 June 2009
  • Posted By David Elliott
  • 7 Comments
  • Human Rights in Iran, Iran Election 2009

Rumors swirl as everyone asks: What’s Next?

Laura Rozen at The Cable tackles the question everyone is asking after the early, and highly questionable, election results first made it clear that Ahmadinejad will be declared this election’s victor.

Leading Iranian opposition presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi was due to give a press conference at 10am Tehran time (8 1/2 hours ahead of EST), a Washington-based Iran hand tells The Cable. Two hours earlier, final vote counts (according to state counters) are expected to be announced.

“If [Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei comes and endorses the results prior to 10am, then a Mousavi protest will be more than a confrontation, but war,” the Iran hand says.

Meantime, an international human rights group says that it has received unconfirmed reports that Mousavi may have been taken into custody by Iranian intelligence officials.

“We were told by very reliable sources that Mousavi was detained on his way to meet the Supreme Leader by members of the intelligence ministry and taken to a safe house to prevent him from making any public announcement,” Hadi Ghaemi, of the Hague-based NGO, the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran, told The Cable.

Ghamei said that the Tehran campaign headquarters of Mousavi and another opposition presidential candidate Mehdai Karoubi have been surrounded and locked by intelligence services.

Yesterday, Mousavi told the press conference, “I am the absolute winner of the election by a very wide margin. It is our duty to defend people’s votes. There is no turning back.”

There is no telling what tomorrow will bring, but the safety of everyone in Iran is foremost in our minds.

Posted By David Elliott

David Elliott is the Assistant Policy Director at the National Iranian American Council.

    7 Responses to “Rumors swirl as everyone asks: What’s Next?”

  1. a reader says:

    are namarda taghalob mikonan 😉 onam 10 milion 😀 khejalat ham nemikeshan, hahaha. u guys should be ashamed of this post. it was ur political naivety that wrongly predicted that Mousavi would win easily. you have made a wrong investment. the point is, Ahmadinejad’s voter were mainly silent. they do the job and go home! in contrast, Mousavi’s ones just make noise, 100 times more than their actual number. It was clear that Ahmadinejad would win the election. Mousavi is in illusion, it seems.

  2. Shahab says:

    Stop these rubish. I have admitted one truth. We, iranians, are just like some sheep that are directed by a particular group of fundamentalists. We can’t change anything untill some illegal centers like Guardian Council and the supreme leader are dominating over us.

  3. john lenhart says:

    ah guyz and gals see uncle monty’s blog and his take on the iranian election at http://thebiggerissue.org/.
    it’s pretty neat, i think … jh.

  4. Phillip Hough says:

    Are there protests going on around the country today? in Washington? in Miami? Where is the Iranian-American community?

  5. Victoria D. says:

    To All Mousavi Supporters:

    There are SO many Americans, and progressive people all over the world who are with you, like me. Like all of us, I, too, am keeping current on all developments in Iran post-election (fraud) results. Do Not Give Up! Look at what we in the USA had to go through for 8 years … what hell! To win a progressive change campaign takes YEARS of FULL-TIME, CONSISTENT, VERY WELL-ORGANIZED, COUNTRY-WIDE ORGANIZATION and PLANNING. We outside of Iran, who are WITH you, we know you WILL succeed! Blessings and Safety Forever, Your American Friend, Victoria

  6. m_a says:

    there is in basic law of iran that the shora negahban must anounce his search until 7_10 days and it is a law that must not do against it but mr khamenei did against the law.in iran we are in every time in fear that they com and will take us to prison because they themself anounce that we see all the things that you write on internet and in iran in all the tim we are waiting to com and take us to prison.we want our right nothing else but we must fear of wanting our right.
    where are you freedom in iran they kill woman and child and no one says nothing

  7. m_a says:

    at the time i am writing this things 2 helikopter is coming near only god can help us nothing else at 4 pm today again there is a big protest i know they kill som people like neda agha soltan

Sign the Petition

 

7,349 signatures

Tell Google: Stop playing Persian Gulf name games!

May 14, 2012
Larry Page
Chief Executive Officer
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, California 94043

Dear Mr. Page:

It has come to our attention that Google has begun omitting the title of the Persian Gulf from its Google Maps application. This is a disconcerting development given the undisputed historic and geographic precedent of the name Persian Gulf, and the more recent history of opening up the name to political, ethnic, and territorial disputes. However unintentionally, in adopting this practice, Google is participating in a dangerous effort to foment tensions and ethnic divisions in the Middle East by politicizing the region’s geographic nomenclature. Members of the Iranian-American community are overwhelmingly opposed to such efforts, particularly at a time when regional tensions already have been pushed to the brink and threaten to spill over into conflict. As the largest grassroots organization in the Iranian-American community, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) calls on Google to not allow its products to become propaganda tools and to immediately reinstate the historically accurate, apolitical title of “Persian Gulf” in all of its informational products, including Google Maps.

Historically, the name “Persian Gulf” is undisputed. The Greek geographer and astronomer Ptolemy referencing in his writings the “Aquarius Persico.” The Romans referred to the "Mare Persicum." The Arabs historically call the body of water, "Bahr al-Farsia." The legal precedent of this nomenclature is also indisputable, with both the United Nations and the United States Board of Geographic Names confirming the sole legitimacy of the term “Persian Gulf.” Agreement on this matter has also been codified by the signatures of all six bordering Arab countries on United Nations directives declaring this body of water to be the Persian Gulf.

But in the past century, and particularly at times of escalating tensions, there have been efforts to exploit the name of the Persian Gulf as a political tool to foment ethnic division. From colonial interests to Arab interests to Iranian interests, the opening of debate regarding the name of the Persian Gulf has been a recent phenomenon that has been exploited for political gain by all sides. Google should not enable these politicized efforts.

In the 1930s, British adviser to Bahrain Sir Charles Belgrave proposed to rename the Persian Gulf, “Arabian Gulf,” a proposal that was rejected by the British Colonial and Foreign offices. Two decades later, the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company resurrected the term during its dispute with Mohammad Mossadegh, the Iranian Prime Minister whose battle with British oil interests would end in a U.S.-sponsored coup d'état that continues to haunt U.S.-Iran relations. In the 1960s, the title “Arabian Gulf” became central to propaganda efforts during the Pan-Arabism era aimed at exploiting ethnic divisions in the region to unite Arabs against non-Arabs, namely Iranians and Israelis. The term was later employed by Saddam Hussein to justify his aims at territorial expansion. Osama Bin Laden even adopted the phrase in an attempt to rally Arab populations by emphasizing ethnic rivalries in the Middle East.

We have serious concerns that Google is now playing into these efforts of geographic politicization. Unfortunately, this is not the first time Google has stirred controversy on this topic. In 2008, Google Earth began including the term “Arabian Gulf” in addition to Persian Gulf as the name for the body of water. NIAC and others called on you then to stop using this ethnically divisive propaganda term, but to no avail. Instead of following the example of organizations like the National Geographic Society, which in 2004 used term “Arabian Gulf” in its maps but recognized the error and corrected it, Google has apparently decided to allow its informational products to become politicized.

Google should rectify this situation and immediately include the proper name for the Persian Gulf in Google Maps and all of its informational products. The exclusion of the title of the Persian Gulf diminishes your applications as informational tools, and raises questions about the integrity and accuracy of information provided by Google.

We strongly urge you to stay true to Google’s mission – “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful” – without distorting or politicizing that information. We look forward to an explanation from you regarding the recent removal of the Persian Gulf name from Google Maps and call on you to immediately correct this mistake.

Sincerely,

[signature]

Share this with your friends: