• 21 June 2009
  • Posted By NIAC
  • Events in Iran, Human Rights in Iran, Iran Election 2009

Iran Updates- June 21

12:45 am: Gary Sick analyzes what he calls Mousavi’s “manifesto”:

It is apparent from this statement that Mousavi’s movement—and Mousavi himself—has evolved enormously in the past week. The candidate started as a mild-mannered reformer. After the searing events of the past several days, he has dared to preach a counter sermon to Khameni’s lecture on Islamic government. Although he never mentions the leader by name, there is no overlooking the direct contradiction of his arguments. This open opposition to the leader by a political figure is unprecedented.

Mousavi has in fact issued a manifesto for a new vision of the Islamic republic. The repression and disdain of the government has brought the opposition to a place they probably never dreamed of going. And no one knows where any of the parties are likely to go next.

12:15 am: A NIAC employee just spoke with a contact in Tehran, who tells us that Iranian security forces are arresting injured demonstrators after they are released by the foreign embassies. This has not been corroborated.

The embassies reportedly started helping some of the injured because those being sent to hospitals were being arrested.

11:59 pm: From Tehran, a friend of a former NIAC intern sends the following message:

A day after the the black Saturday, you could see people shocked with the news of the killings. We all knew that these guys are savages. But what we did not think was that, in the time of the Internet and mobile phones with cameras, they would show their real face so early.

People want revenge. You probably have read what Iranians are posting on the Internet. “Neda” has become a hero–we will definitely rename the street where she was killed after her. We will fight back. People have not stopped chanting God is Great. The funniest thing is that a government which claims to get its legitimacy from Allah and Islam cannot stand people saying “Allah-o-Akbar”.

Nevertheless, there is nothing they can hide. We still have very slow Internet access which, if people continue to protest, I believe will be shut down completely. The only concern that we have now is the bloody Rajavis (MEK), who now want to benefit from the situation. They are definitely helping the dictators. They are only giving more reasons for cracking down the people. May God protect us all.

11:37 pm: There are now blogs and websites in Persian being circulated that tell you how to stop bleeding, etc. This one tells you how to take care of someone who has been shot, and this one says how to stop bleeding in general.

11:03 pm: Thinking up new ways to protest.

According to Kalemeh News [Persian], people are finding creative ways to protest since they have not been able to get permits for peaceful demonstrations. “People have decided to turn on their [automobile] headlights on Monday from 5pm to 6pm. It seems like this new method of protest is a result of unprecedented restrictions and harsh treatment of the people by the armed forces and militias.

10:27 pm: Mousavi’s statement.

An amazing NIAC member, Arvin, translated Mousavi’s 6th statement, which was posted today. The original Farsi is here: http://ghalamnews.org/news-21185.aspx [The newspaper, affiliated with Mousavi, was reportedly hacked earlier today and now appears down.]

It is worth nothing that unlike his earlier statements he is no longer saying there is doubt about the election or irregularity; he outright calls it cheating as a foregone conclusion. Also when he refers to “unlawfulness by the government” that is code for Ahmadinejad. That is what he called him during the debates, and is what he said he has come to stop. He also urges the people to keep their protests nonviolent.

In the name of God, the compassionate and merciful,

We are all from God, and one day we will return to Him [A Koranic quote, that signifies readiness for death]

The heart-wrenching news of martyrdom of a group of protestors, against widespread cheating in recent elections, has cast a pall of silence and sadness over our society. Opening fire on people, militarizing the city, spreading fear, provoking [the public] and power displays are all illegitimate children of the unlawfulness which we face and it is bewildering that the perpetrators of these acts accuse others of this. To those who call people lawless for expressing their opinions, I say that the biggest act of lawlessness is indifference [to the public] and contravention of the explicit [text] of article 27 of the constitution [allowing public demonstrations] by the government in not issuing permits for peaceful gatherings. Do revolutionary people who, with gatherings like these brought you and us out of the dark history of the Shah’s tyranny, need to be beaten and wounded and be threatened with force?

I, as a mourner, invite the people to self-restraint. The country belongs to you. The revolution and the government are your inheritances. Objecting to lies and cheating is your right. Be hopeful in exercising your rights and do not allow those, who try to instill fear in you to dissuade you, to make you angry. Continue to avoid violence in your protests and treat the disproportionate actions of the security forces as broken hearted parents would their children. Having said that, I expect that security forces will not allow memories of these days to cause irreparable harm in their relationship with the people. That they [security forces] are not informing the families of the martyred, the wounded, and the arrested, and are keeping them hidden and in limbo will not aid in restoration of peace and will antagonize [people’s] emotions. Arbitrary arrests lead to loss of respect and authority of security forces in the mind of the people and the society.

I ask the Almighty to be compassionate towards these martyrs and to give them the highest of honors, and for their stricken families I wish patience and fulfillment of their dreams.

Mir Hossein Moussavi

31 Khordad, 1388 [June 21, 2009]

4:53 pm: Tom Friedman has a column in today’s Sunday New York Times in which he says Iran has found intself in 1979 all over again.

But now, having voted with their ballots, Iranians who want a change will have to vote again with their bodies. A regime like Iran’s can only be brought down or changed if enough Iranians vote as they did in 1979 — in the street. That is what the regime fears most, because then it either has to shoot its own people or cede power. That is why it was no accident that the “supreme leader,” Ayatollah Khamenei, warned protestors in his Friday speech that “street challenge is not acceptable.” That’s a man who knows how he got his job.

And so the gauntlet is now thrown down. If the reformers want change, they are going to have to form a leadership, lay out their vision for Iran and keep voting in the streets — over and over and over. Only if they keep showing up with their bodies, and by so doing saying to their regime “we cannot be bought and we will not be cowed,” will their ballots be made to count.

Friedman hopes that the Iranian people will continue to demonstrate in the streets in such numbers and with such fervor as to eventually challenge the ruling authority for control. He has no idea about how this will all end–nor do any of us–but I’m not entirely sure he’s on the right track with this.

Watching the images of the demonstrators clashing with security forces, and seeing the carnage that is being inflicted on totally innocent citizens just for being out on the street, it is hard for me to hope that this will go on any longer than it already has. I believe as strongly as anyone that the people of Iran should be granted the freedom to choose their own future, without fear of intimidation or coercion. But the pictures and videos, many of which we’ve posted on these pages, are so heart-wrenching that I find myself just hoping it will all stop.

Am I inspired by the chants of “Allahu Akbar” as they crescendo every night from the rooftops? Absolutely. Am I heartened by the courage and selflessness of those demonstrators who stare down the barrel of a gun for something so ethereal as a more representative form of government? Yes. But I am also finding myself increasingly hoping that some compromise may be struck to avoid the seemingly inevitible brutality that all of the last week’s events appear to be leading up to. I’m asking myself if it will be enough for the Iranian government to moderate itself in some way, accommodating some of the demands of the population while still maintaining its ultimate hold on power.

Obviously, this is not for me to determine, but rather a question that the demonstrators themselves–and the handful of leaders that have yet to really step up to the plate–will have to decide. Are they willing to accept anything less than full revolution? Tom Friedman may think they shouldn’t, but the answer to that question will actually mean life or death for a lot of people.

3:23 pm: According to Taban News, Mohammad Khatami released a statement expressing deep concern about the violence and militarization of society, and says that the suppression of peaceful civil disobedience will have dangerous consequences. He calls on security forces and Iranian leaders to respect the people’s civil and political rights, to immediately release those detained, and restore all internal and external communications that have been blocked. He also calls for an independent commission to be established to investigate and find solutions to the crisis. The Farsi text can be found here.

2:57 pm: According to this video, protests continue today in Tehran despite yesterday’s violence. At first you will hear the cries of “God is Great!” Followed by “Don’t be afraid! Don’t be afraid! We are all together!” And then “Death to the Dictator!”

2:53 pm: According to Twitter almost all of Mousavi’s campaign managers have been arrested.

1:54 pm: Al Arabiya follows up on the story we translated yesterday, examining what Rafsanjani is doing amid all the turmoil. (h/t Nico)

Iran’s religious clerks in Qom and members of the Assembly of Experts, headed by former President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, are mulling the formation of an alternative collective leadership to replace that of the supreme leader, sources in Qom told Al Arabiya on condition of anonymity. … [Ed: Note the glaring mistake. Rafsanjani is the head of the Assembly]

Members of the assembly are reportedly considering forming a collective ruling body and scrapping the model of Ayatollah Khomeini as a way out of the civil crisis that has engulfed Tehran in a series of protests,

The discussions have taken place in a series of secret meetings convened in the holy city of Qom and included Jawad al-Shahristani, the supreme representative of Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, who is the foremost Shiite leader in Iraq.

1:29 pm: Rallies in DC –

There were 300 people at the Iranian Interest section chanting “Don’t be afraid, don’t be afraid, we are all together” and “Democracy for Iran.”

That number has grown to 500 people in front of the Russian Embassy chanting “Russia, Russia, shame, shame.” Russia was quick to recognize Ahmadinejad’s disputed victory.

A reader notes that it wasn’t just Iranian-Americans at yesterday’s rally:

I was there, too, as a plain-old American woman brokenhearted over the situation in Iran. I marched out of love for the Iranian people, and to support them and Iranian-Americans in their fight for peace and justice.

12:57 pm: Reuters reports on the latest:

  • Ayatollah Montazeri has called for three days of mourning.
  • Former President Khatami issued a strong statement: “Preventing people from expressing their demands through civil ways will have dangerous consequences.”
  • Meanwhile, the state media is calling the demonstrators “rioters” and “terrorists”

12:46 pm: A reader, Mersedeh, sends us a note about the information gap in Iran:

Despite comments from some of the Iranian commentators on CNN, it is *not* true that everyone in Iran is aware of the current situation or happenings on the street. I “just” got off the phone with a family member in Tehran who was under the impression that nothing happened yesterday (Sat, Iran time) and that the city was calm. When I told her of the gatherings and lives lost (both in Tehran and violence in Shiraz, etc…) she was shocked and exclaimed that “they are not allowing us find anything out”. Without newspapers, real media coverage on TV and satellite dishes that have been taken away, many are left in the dark.

11:47 am: A reader, Hooman, passed on this letter, which he translated:

To All Iranians Who Voted for Ahmadinejad

I don’t know how many of you who read my blog voted for Ahmadinejad. I know three of you who did. Do you know why I have never asked? Because elections mean just this — you vote for Ahmadinejad, I vote for Mousavi, and someone even votes for Googoosh [a famous Iranian singer].

So, we all are worthy of respect. Last week, a large number of our countrymen developed some doubts about the results of the election. Simply doubts. They took to the streets and asked that the election be re-done. Today, they are being killed. As long as it was only their protest, you had no responsibility for the situation. You had cast your own vote. But today, it is your right too that is being squandered. Through these killings, your precious vote is being questioned as well. Today, it is your turn to ask for new elections. You know that with a margin of 10 million votes, you will always end up victorious. So let the doubts be put to rest. Let us not allow anyone to die

I have not stopped shedding tears today. It is not important to me who the dead that I see before me are — whether or not they think like me. I only know that they are my countrymen. My countrymen and yours. A countryman is very dear. Believe me. I swear that if Mousavi had won, and you were in the streets today, and someone was forcing blood from your nose, I would have taken to the street. I swear to my loved ones that I would have come.

I don’t vote so that blood may fall from anyone’s nose. I respect the development of my nation. The sound of your cries of pain in our mother-tongue would destroy something deep inside me, such that the wounds would never heal. If you read my blog, go. In these thirty years, this is the first time that such doubts have been raised. And these doubts destroy your rights too.

I feel that today it is no longer important who you or I voted for. We didn’t vote for these events. We didn’t vote for killings. If a new election can calm our nation — avoid the loss of the forty lives we are losing every day — keep our votes alive — then why not? I refuse to believe that 24 million of my countrymen have no problem with the killing of the rest of the country. I know that you too are crying. You too cannot even open your eyes. You too did not vote for death. Please come. I am afraid.

11:19 am: (Updated) Press TV runs Larijani’s criticism of the Guardian Council, IRIB:

Iran’s Parliament (Majlis) Speaker Ali Larijani suggests that some of the members in the Guardian Council have sided with a certain candidate in the June 12 presidential election.

Speaking live on the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) Channel 2 on Saturday, the speaker said that “a majority of people are of the opinion that the actual election results are different than what was officially announced.”

“The opinion of this majority should be respected and a line should be drawn between them and rioters and miscreants,” he was quoted as saying by Khabaronline — a website affiliated with him. …

Larijani, however, believes that the Iranian people have lost their trust in the country’s legal system. “Although the Guardian Council is made up of religious individuals I wish certain members would not side with a certain presidential candidate.”

“The Guardian Council should use every possible means to build trust and convince the protesters that their complaints will be thoroughly looked into,” the parliament speaker added.

Larijani who, was formerly in charge of IRIB, criticized the organization, saying that “the IRIB should not act in a way that provokes people.”

The authorities should provide an atmosphere in which people feel free to express their opinion, he concluded.

Larijani is considered close to the supreme leader, but not to Ahmadinejad.
11:03 am: CNN has posted a less-graphic version of of the video showing Neda’s death. It’s still gut-wrenching to see this innocent woman killed in the streets the way she was. The original version is very, very difficult to watch.

10:53 am: A reader at Huffington challenges the story in the Iranian media, which we picked up, that the Assembly of Experts came out in support of the Khamenei’s Friday sermon:

I just wanted to point out that the letter of support written by assembly of experts in support of Khamenei’s sermon is only signed by the deputy leader of the assembly, who is a former head of the judiciary and a staunch supporter of ahmadinejad, as well as a rival of Rafsanjani for the assembly’s leadership election. He is the only one signing the letter and the government sponsored news media are reporting it as a letter from the full assembly.

This emphasizes a point that we made when we reported on the alleged bombing of the shrine of the Imam Khomeini – state media reports should be read with a skeptical eye.

10:38 am: The New York Times describes the scene:

A day after police and militia forces used guns, truncheons, tear gas and water cannons to beat back thousands of demonstrators, a tense quiet set over this city Sunday as the standoff between the government and thousands of protestors hardened into a test of wills that has spilled blood and claimed lives.

It was unclear how the confrontation would play out now that the government has abandoned its restraint and large numbers of protestors have demonstrated their willingness to risk injury and even death as they continue to dispute the results of Iran’s presidential election nine days ago.

Iranian state television reported that 13 people were killed in the clashes Saturday.

State television also reported that the government had arrested five members of the family of Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the former president who heads two influential councils in Iran, a move that escalates the government’s crackdown against the reform movement.

There was no sign on the streets early Sunday of the heavy security forces from the night before, but there were reports that protestors planned to demonstrate again later in the day, beginning at about 5 p.m., giving both sides time to regroup, or reconsider.

9:56 am: From a contact in Iran on why he protests.

I’m not doing this to prove I’m brave, because I’m not. The people that run towards the Basij with bare hands and the ones that have died are the brave ones. I’m doing this because we deserve more.

There are no clear rallies for today but most of us are just going wherever there are crowds…Don’t let people forget us so quickly.

Posted By NIAC

    9 Responses to “Iran Updates- June 21”

  1. irangcc says:

    you might be interested in this:

    collaborative translation of underground newspaper “the street” circulating in Iran. Looking for more Persian speakers to help!

  2. Jonathan says:

    That protester may not think he or she is brave, but every day he or she goes out into the street there has to be the knowledge that he or she may not come back.

    Courage isn’t the lack of fear. It’s doing what is right despite the risk. In my opinion this protester has enough courage for democracy to work anywhere.

  3. Our False Prophet appears to have no idea what a golden opportunity he’s passing up… overthrow this evil, terrorism-exporting enemy without firing a single shot… get their Armageddon-inspired nuke program off the world stage… and free 30 million people all at one time.

    But the boy wonder is too stupid to see it… or somehow just doesn’t care?
    And isn’t this what George W Bush told you was going to happen in the Middle East in the wake of Iraq’s liberation?

    Maybe that’s why Barack Obama has so little apparent interest in finishing the job in Iran… no matter how much it benefits the US and free world.

    That, and the fact that he’s already piled all his chips on legitimizing this vile regime- a democratic revolution at this point would be embarrassing.


  4. Our False Prophet appears to have no idea what a golden opportunity he’s passing up… overthrow this evil, terrorism-exporting enemy without firing a single shot… get their Armageddon-inspired nuke program off the world stage… and free 30 million people all at one time.

    But the boy wonder is too stupid to see it… or somehow just doesn’t care?
    And isn’t this what George W Bush told you was going to happen in the Middle East in the wake of Iraq’s liberation?

    Maybe that’s why Barack Obama has so little apparent interest in finishing the job in Iran… no matter how much it benefits the US and free world.

    That, and the fact that he’s already piled all his chips on legitimizing this vile regime- a democratic revolution at this point would be embarrassing.

  5. Morvarid says:

    This is from this website

    Unverified number of people killed during yesterdays protests. Reports vary from 13 to 20. From the various posts I’ve read I would suspect many more have died but are not being reported. State TV in Iran is definitely not reporting the true figures.

    More protesting is continuing today with heavy police prescence at the main squares

    Hundreds of people were injured by tear gas, live bullets, water canons, battons and the liquid substance poured onto crowds from helicopters

    Hospitals in Tehran have sent out messages requesting more blood

    Iran’s influential parliamentary speaker Ali Larijani implied Saturday the election authority sided with a certain candidate ( Ahmadinejad).

    National Police Chief Ismaeil Ahmadi-Moqaddam has said that the police’s strategy so far has been to show leniency toward Mir-Hossein Mousavi’s supporters, who have been rallying in the streets claiming election fraud in the June 12 presidential election.

    Confirmation today that Faeze Hashemi Rafsanjani arrested yesterday. She is the daughter of former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani

    Guardian Council members meet with the clergy and religious leaders in Qom with the promise to fully follow up on election complaints

    Iranian dissident grand Ayatollah Montazeri calls three days of mourning for killed protesters

    I have heard rumours that the government are in conflict with the army in regards to the recent protests.

    Yahoo, Gmail and Hotmail is now completely out of service in Iran

    Nationwide Strike could happen Tuesday June 23rd 2009

    Bomb has exploded in Taleqani square. Beleived to be at the Metro Station. Many people may be dead from blast

    Latest statement by Mir Hossein Mousavi – Click Here

    Thousands of protestors are gathering at the UN Headquarters in Tehran, some have been arrested

    Peaceful candle holding protestors in Hafte Tir Square have been attacked by anti-riot police

    Reports also suggest certain Mosques have been set on fire and people killed

    Most foreign journalists have been asked to leave. Reports continuing that many Iranian Journalists have been arrested.

    Some people ae beating the government restrictions on the internet by using Tor
    See this link for details – Click Here ( Farsi & English available for site)

    This evening the chants have begun again from the rooftops of Tehran.
    Every evening since the election these chants grow louder.
    They shout “God is Great” and “Death to the Dictator”

  6. Solomon2 says:

    Is there really any alternative other than revolution? If the mobs give up with the Ayatollahs still in power, won’t the Basij’s just take them one by one in the middle of the night instead? The Russians replaced almost the entire city of Leningrad that way in the 1930s – and Iran’s current rulers studied that process at Western universities in the 1970s.

  7. RD says:

    Tehran, June 21st, Forsat Shirazi St.

    Has this video been verified? None of the news channels are able to verify it.

  8. Rosa says:

    It always felt like this was going to have an inevitable result, the suppression of dissidents as has happened in other revolutions : http://www.newsy.com/videos/protests_in_perspectives
    But the Iranian protesters have shown fortitude and courage in the face of oblivion. I hope that this can end another way.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Sign the Petition


7,349 signatures

Tell Google: Stop playing Persian Gulf name games!

May 14, 2012
Larry Page
Chief Executive Officer
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, California 94043

Dear Mr. Page:

It has come to our attention that Google has begun omitting the title of the Persian Gulf from its Google Maps application. This is a disconcerting development given the undisputed historic and geographic precedent of the name Persian Gulf, and the more recent history of opening up the name to political, ethnic, and territorial disputes. However unintentionally, in adopting this practice, Google is participating in a dangerous effort to foment tensions and ethnic divisions in the Middle East by politicizing the region’s geographic nomenclature. Members of the Iranian-American community are overwhelmingly opposed to such efforts, particularly at a time when regional tensions already have been pushed to the brink and threaten to spill over into conflict. As the largest grassroots organization in the Iranian-American community, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) calls on Google to not allow its products to become propaganda tools and to immediately reinstate the historically accurate, apolitical title of “Persian Gulf” in all of its informational products, including Google Maps.

Historically, the name “Persian Gulf” is undisputed. The Greek geographer and astronomer Ptolemy referencing in his writings the “Aquarius Persico.” The Romans referred to the "Mare Persicum." The Arabs historically call the body of water, "Bahr al-Farsia." The legal precedent of this nomenclature is also indisputable, with both the United Nations and the United States Board of Geographic Names confirming the sole legitimacy of the term “Persian Gulf.” Agreement on this matter has also been codified by the signatures of all six bordering Arab countries on United Nations directives declaring this body of water to be the Persian Gulf.

But in the past century, and particularly at times of escalating tensions, there have been efforts to exploit the name of the Persian Gulf as a political tool to foment ethnic division. From colonial interests to Arab interests to Iranian interests, the opening of debate regarding the name of the Persian Gulf has been a recent phenomenon that has been exploited for political gain by all sides. Google should not enable these politicized efforts.

In the 1930s, British adviser to Bahrain Sir Charles Belgrave proposed to rename the Persian Gulf, “Arabian Gulf,” a proposal that was rejected by the British Colonial and Foreign offices. Two decades later, the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company resurrected the term during its dispute with Mohammad Mossadegh, the Iranian Prime Minister whose battle with British oil interests would end in a U.S.-sponsored coup d'état that continues to haunt U.S.-Iran relations. In the 1960s, the title “Arabian Gulf” became central to propaganda efforts during the Pan-Arabism era aimed at exploiting ethnic divisions in the region to unite Arabs against non-Arabs, namely Iranians and Israelis. The term was later employed by Saddam Hussein to justify his aims at territorial expansion. Osama Bin Laden even adopted the phrase in an attempt to rally Arab populations by emphasizing ethnic rivalries in the Middle East.

We have serious concerns that Google is now playing into these efforts of geographic politicization. Unfortunately, this is not the first time Google has stirred controversy on this topic. In 2008, Google Earth began including the term “Arabian Gulf” in addition to Persian Gulf as the name for the body of water. NIAC and others called on you then to stop using this ethnically divisive propaganda term, but to no avail. Instead of following the example of organizations like the National Geographic Society, which in 2004 used term “Arabian Gulf” in its maps but recognized the error and corrected it, Google has apparently decided to allow its informational products to become politicized.

Google should rectify this situation and immediately include the proper name for the Persian Gulf in Google Maps and all of its informational products. The exclusion of the title of the Persian Gulf diminishes your applications as informational tools, and raises questions about the integrity and accuracy of information provided by Google.

We strongly urge you to stay true to Google’s mission – “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful” – without distorting or politicizing that information. We look forward to an explanation from you regarding the recent removal of the Persian Gulf name from Google Maps and call on you to immediately correct this mistake.



Share this with your friends: