• 30 July 2009
  • Posted By Patrick Disney
  • Events in Iran, Iran Election 2009, MEK, UN, US-Iran War

John Bolton *still wants to bomb Iran

[vodpod id=ExternalVideo.855715&w=425&h=350&fv=]

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart last night featured former Bush Administration UN Ambassador John Bolton, who is now a senior fellow at the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute in Washington DC.  Bolton has been busy lately, penning op-eds on the need for harsh action against Iran, lest Tehran obtain a nuclear weapon and destroy Israel and the United States.

Aside from his bizarrely enthusiastic support for what he calls “Iranian dissidents” (based on his description, it’s clear he means the MEK), Bolton laments the fact that to this day neither Israel nor the United States has “stepped up” to attack Iran militarily.  He tries to depict his recommendation as the product of a rational calculation, and even goes so far as to call his conclusion regrettable; but his eagerness to attack Iran comes across on television as bloodlust, plain and simple.

And as if that weren’t brazen enough (though it did remind us all why we’re not exactly nostalgic for his term at the United Nations), he finished the segment with a flippant comment about how he wishes the United States were the only nuclear-armed country in the world.  Our friend Joe Cirincione of the Ploughshares Fund took that one on over at the HuffingtonPost, articulating how Bolton’s joke was as unwise as it was unfunny.

With all the unrest in Iran over the last few weeks, and the disturbing images that have been coming out of the country, at least we can find some comfort in the fact that no one but the most fringe elements in the neoconservative camp take any of these arguments seriously.  Small comfort.

Posted By Patrick Disney

    8 Responses to “John Bolton *still wants to bomb Iran”

  1. Ellie says:

    I am not surprised by John Bolton’s statements, after all he epitomizes the very wost US politics can offer. Thankfully there is a diverent attitude now in the Obama administration.

  2. bizychic says:

    Moron. Citizens spends hours showing their support for these people and this clown has to open his mouth and let that tripe roll out. You’re a real gem of American society Mr. Bolton.

  3. Ben says:

    I’m surprised someone with Bolton’s credentials would use South Africa as an example of a nation giving up nuclear weapons as a result of democracy. He probably does not fully grasp the meaning of democracy because the U.S., France, India, Israel, and to a lesser extend the U.K., are all democracies that pursued and currently posses nuclear weapons. Apartheid South Africa was a white democracy. Only when they accepted that they could no longer remain a white democracy did they “voluntarily” give up their nuclear weapons program. In an all inclusive democracy, whites would have been a small minority and this would have put a black run government in charge of nukes.

    Mr. Bolton either does not comprehend how racially charged is the South African example, or he believes his objective justifies fabricating false information, both of which clearly demonstrate why he is not and was never fit to lead ANY government office.

  4. Bijan says:

    More evidence that American foreign policy “experts” have no understanding of the history or culture of others in the world, specifically the ones they claim to have a deep understanding of. I am becoming more of a fan of John Stewart and appreciate his counter arguments to Ambassador Bolton’s comments plus he dialogue with Reza Aslan a few weeks back.

  5. Mithridates says:

    Having John Bolton on the Daily Show is a nice reminder that these people are no longer in power. It’s odd how people like him manage to intentionally ignore the continuing protests and rush to the conclusion that it’s time for a bombing.

    Plus the idea that Iranians would just shrug their shoulders after being hit by a strike from Israel. Nothing would derail the protests more than something like that.

    By the way, linking directly from thedailyshow.com is better IMO. I can’t see Hulu links where I am (Korea) but the Daily Show works fine.

  6. rwp says:

    And in this post and comments we see the pussification of the United States.

    Bend over and beg for it. The girly boys over at the HuffPo would love you for it.

  7. regionarrington says:

    Excuse me but no one from the prior Bush administration understood “the meaning of democracy,” they wire taped us and spit on the constitution for eight years. They had a desire to spread their brand of democracy around the word but what they failed to understand is that it already exists. Their brand of democracy exists in China, the former USSR and others to name and few. We need to promote peace and democracy but not a gun point or by dropping bombs.

  8. abu ameerah says:


    bolton should just sign a deal with Faux News and get a show like Mike Huckabee. the program could be titled “Bolton and Friends” or “Your World [Bombed] with John Bolton”…

    also, he looks like a long lost relative of Mark Twain…

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Sign the Petition


7,350 signatures

Tell Google: Stop playing Persian Gulf name games!

May 14, 2012
Larry Page
Chief Executive Officer
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, California 94043

Dear Mr. Page:

It has come to our attention that Google has begun omitting the title of the Persian Gulf from its Google Maps application. This is a disconcerting development given the undisputed historic and geographic precedent of the name Persian Gulf, and the more recent history of opening up the name to political, ethnic, and territorial disputes. However unintentionally, in adopting this practice, Google is participating in a dangerous effort to foment tensions and ethnic divisions in the Middle East by politicizing the region’s geographic nomenclature. Members of the Iranian-American community are overwhelmingly opposed to such efforts, particularly at a time when regional tensions already have been pushed to the brink and threaten to spill over into conflict. As the largest grassroots organization in the Iranian-American community, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) calls on Google to not allow its products to become propaganda tools and to immediately reinstate the historically accurate, apolitical title of “Persian Gulf” in all of its informational products, including Google Maps.

Historically, the name “Persian Gulf” is undisputed. The Greek geographer and astronomer Ptolemy referencing in his writings the “Aquarius Persico.” The Romans referred to the "Mare Persicum." The Arabs historically call the body of water, "Bahr al-Farsia." The legal precedent of this nomenclature is also indisputable, with both the United Nations and the United States Board of Geographic Names confirming the sole legitimacy of the term “Persian Gulf.” Agreement on this matter has also been codified by the signatures of all six bordering Arab countries on United Nations directives declaring this body of water to be the Persian Gulf.

But in the past century, and particularly at times of escalating tensions, there have been efforts to exploit the name of the Persian Gulf as a political tool to foment ethnic division. From colonial interests to Arab interests to Iranian interests, the opening of debate regarding the name of the Persian Gulf has been a recent phenomenon that has been exploited for political gain by all sides. Google should not enable these politicized efforts.

In the 1930s, British adviser to Bahrain Sir Charles Belgrave proposed to rename the Persian Gulf, “Arabian Gulf,” a proposal that was rejected by the British Colonial and Foreign offices. Two decades later, the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company resurrected the term during its dispute with Mohammad Mossadegh, the Iranian Prime Minister whose battle with British oil interests would end in a U.S.-sponsored coup d'état that continues to haunt U.S.-Iran relations. In the 1960s, the title “Arabian Gulf” became central to propaganda efforts during the Pan-Arabism era aimed at exploiting ethnic divisions in the region to unite Arabs against non-Arabs, namely Iranians and Israelis. The term was later employed by Saddam Hussein to justify his aims at territorial expansion. Osama Bin Laden even adopted the phrase in an attempt to rally Arab populations by emphasizing ethnic rivalries in the Middle East.

We have serious concerns that Google is now playing into these efforts of geographic politicization. Unfortunately, this is not the first time Google has stirred controversy on this topic. In 2008, Google Earth began including the term “Arabian Gulf” in addition to Persian Gulf as the name for the body of water. NIAC and others called on you then to stop using this ethnically divisive propaganda term, but to no avail. Instead of following the example of organizations like the National Geographic Society, which in 2004 used term “Arabian Gulf” in its maps but recognized the error and corrected it, Google has apparently decided to allow its informational products to become politicized.

Google should rectify this situation and immediately include the proper name for the Persian Gulf in Google Maps and all of its informational products. The exclusion of the title of the Persian Gulf diminishes your applications as informational tools, and raises questions about the integrity and accuracy of information provided by Google.

We strongly urge you to stay true to Google’s mission – “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful” – without distorting or politicizing that information. We look forward to an explanation from you regarding the recent removal of the Persian Gulf name from Google Maps and call on you to immediately correct this mistake.



Share this with your friends: