- 26 October 2010
- 2 Comments
- Persian Gulf
Fueling Ethnic Tensions in the Persian Gulf is Not a Strategy for Middle East Stability
26 October 2010 Posted By Jamal Abdi
Washington risks entering into a game of escalating provocations with Tehran even as continuing efforts to restart talks in November are underway. Iran’s announcement that the two US hikers being held Evin prison will now face trial just ahead of the talks is no coincidence. The move is particularly shameful considering that these US citizens have been held for over a year without formal charges and recently leaked military reports support the hiker’s assertion that they were captured in Iraq – not in Iran. Meanwhile, last week’s announcement of the largest US arms deal in history, a $60 billion deal with Saudi Arabia that includes advanced aircraft and bunker busting bombs, was clearly aimed at Tehran.
But while the package was branded as an effort to “enhance regional stability” by reassuring Persian Gulf states of the United States’ commitment to their security, the State Department broke its own longstanding protocol and used provocative, ethnically divisive language when announcing the deal.
Instead of using the historically accepted term – and observing State Department protocol – “Persian Gulf”, Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs Andrew Shapiro referred to the “Arabian Gulf”, a politically charged phrase with a relatively recent but insidious history.
Tell Secretary Clinton: Referring to Persian Gulf as “Arabian Gulf” Only Fuels Ethnic Tensions ->
2 Responses to “Fueling Ethnic Tensions in the Persian Gulf is Not a Strategy for Middle East Stability”
With all that USN military hardware based in Bahrain and USAF military hardware parked at Qatar, I’m surprised these US administrations don’t refer to it as the American Gulf.
I believe the assistant secretary of State needs to review his history and geography lessons.
Besides, Unfortunately a general knowledge of the world has not ever been American forte.
Hope such ignorance does not cause unnecessary conflicts among nations.