• 20 July 2012
  • Posted By Jessica Schieder
  • 0 Comments
  • NIAC round-up

Iran News Roundup: July 20, 2012

U.S. Officials Blame Hezbollah for Terror Attack

Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that American officials identified the man as a member of a Hezbollah cell “acting under broad guidance” to hit Israeli targets. A U.S. official said it was a “tit for tat” attack done to retaliate for the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists by Israel (NYT 7/19).

Bulgarian Foreign Minister Nikolay Mladenov cautioned against speculating over who carried out the terrorist attack in Burgas, saying it would be “wrong and a mistake to point fingers at this stage of the investigation at any country or organization” (Haaretz 7/20).

U.S. Says Iran Developed Plans to Disrupt Oil Trade

U.S. officials have said that new intelligence indicates that Iran has developed plans to attack oil platforms and tankers to disrupt international oil trade “both inside and outside the Persian Gulf.” One U.S. official commented, “This doesn’t mean they would do something, as there are significant costs the Iranians would have to consider, but this is something to keep an eye on,” (WSJ 7/19).

Israeli Poll Shows Little Support for Unilateral Strike on Iran

In a poll by Israeli daily, Maariv, only 19 percent of Israelis said they support a unilateral strike against Iran. 26 percent said Israel should only strike with U.S. backing, and 29 percent said Israel should take no action. 26 percent were undecided (Reuters 7/20).

Letter Encourages President Obama to Blacklist 65 Iranian Officials

A letter sent to President Obama yesterday, signed by Senator Kirk, Senator Kyl, and Senator Lieberman, encourages a the President to blacklist 65 Iranian officials for human rights abuses. The letter encourages the President to harden his stance on Iran (Reuters 7/19).

Iranian MPs Support Closing Strait of Hormuz

Iranian news sources report that legislation proposed by Iranian lawmaker Javad Karimi Qodoosi to close the Strait of Hormuz gained the support of over half of the Iranian parliament (AP 7/20).

Hezbollah Leader Offers Insight into Group’s Dependence on Assad, Iran

In a televised address, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah emphasized the importance of the Syrian government’s support for Hezbollah (NYT 7/19).

Investigators Examining U.N. Sanctions Violations Ask for “Unfettered Access”

In response to an investigation by the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee requesting “unfettered access” to U.N. documents regarding equipment provided to sanctioned countries, the head of the U.N. World Intellectual Property Organization says it has asked U.N. sanctions officials to review computer equipment it provided Iran and North Korea (AP 7/19).

“Crackdown” on Ahwazi Arabs in Iran Escalates

Iran has reportedly stepped up its “crackdown” on Ahwazi Arab Iranians, according to The Guardian. At least five Arab prisoners at Karoun prison in Ahwaz are to be imminently executed for links to terrorist organization and shootings. Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch, said, “The judiciary has put forth no public evidence suggesting that these men should spend one more day in prison, let alone hang from the gallows,” (The Guardian 7/19).

Retired Israeli Air Force Pilot Calls an Israeli Attack on Iran an Existential “Gamble”

In an interview with Haaretz, retired Israeli Air Force pilot of more than 20 years and high-tech investor, Kobi Richter, described an attack on Iran by Israel as, “A gamble on our very survival.” He elaborated saying, “What disturbs me in particular about this kind of distorted outlook is its potential connection to operational considerations and operational plans,” (Haaretz 7/20).

NYPD Release Report on Revolutionary Guard Activity

The New York Police Department (NYPD) said in a report that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and their proxies have been involved in nine terror plot against Jews and Israelis this year. The report suggested Iran had “sharply increased its operational tempo and its willingness to conduct terrorist attacks targeting Israeli interests and the International Jewish community worldwide,” (Reuters 7/20).

U.S. Treasury: Iranian Ships Might Use “Deceptive Practices”

The U.S. Treasury has issued an advisory to the maritime industry, warning that Iranian ships may be operating without registration to evade sanctions “through deceptive practices.” “Therefore, maritime authorities should be alert to the presentation by Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines of potentially fabricated vessel registration and flag credentials at ports of call and canal entrances,” said the advisory (WSJ 7/19).

European Traders Contacted “Daily” with Offers on Cheap Iranian Crude

Oil traders for European refineries are reporting that obscure private firms are contacting them on a daily basis, offering for Iranian crude at discounted prices. Some offers also allegedly include fake paperwork to disguise the origins of the oil. (Reuters 7/20).

 

Notable Opinion: “Sliding Toward War With Iran”

Paul Pillar comments on escalations in US-Iranian tensions:

Although the chance of war with Iran gets attention among policy cognoscenti in Washington, the danger is underappreciated among the American public. The presidential election campaign isn’t helping and instead is making things worse. President Obama apparently has opted to try to keep a lid on the Iranian nuclear issue through election day rather than resolving it. Mitt Romney, in trying to score points against the president, only tells us that we ought to be more afraid of an Iranian nuclear weapon than a new war in the Middle East. This raises the question of how such fear, of a still nonexistent weapon in the hands of a second-rate power on the other side of the globe, is consistent with the vision of a proud and powerful America that one hears in the rest of his message.

The danger of a war needs to be taken seriously. That means using those sanctions we have piled on Iran as leverage, which is not how we have used them so far, to make possible a nuclear agreement with Tehran. It means emphasizing communications and procedures in the Persian Gulf that will minimize the chance of an escalation-prone incident, rather than merely bringing in more sabers and rattling them more loudly. And it means distancing and dissociating the United States as much as possible from destructive and destabilizing actions by Israel.

Read the full article at The National Interest

Posted By Jessica Schieder

Leave a Reply




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


Sign the Petition

 

7,349 signatures

Tell Google: Stop playing Persian Gulf name games!

May 14, 2012
Larry Page
Chief Executive Officer
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, California 94043

Dear Mr. Page:

It has come to our attention that Google has begun omitting the title of the Persian Gulf from its Google Maps application. This is a disconcerting development given the undisputed historic and geographic precedent of the name Persian Gulf, and the more recent history of opening up the name to political, ethnic, and territorial disputes. However unintentionally, in adopting this practice, Google is participating in a dangerous effort to foment tensions and ethnic divisions in the Middle East by politicizing the region’s geographic nomenclature. Members of the Iranian-American community are overwhelmingly opposed to such efforts, particularly at a time when regional tensions already have been pushed to the brink and threaten to spill over into conflict. As the largest grassroots organization in the Iranian-American community, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) calls on Google to not allow its products to become propaganda tools and to immediately reinstate the historically accurate, apolitical title of “Persian Gulf” in all of its informational products, including Google Maps.

Historically, the name “Persian Gulf” is undisputed. The Greek geographer and astronomer Ptolemy referencing in his writings the “Aquarius Persico.” The Romans referred to the "Mare Persicum." The Arabs historically call the body of water, "Bahr al-Farsia." The legal precedent of this nomenclature is also indisputable, with both the United Nations and the United States Board of Geographic Names confirming the sole legitimacy of the term “Persian Gulf.” Agreement on this matter has also been codified by the signatures of all six bordering Arab countries on United Nations directives declaring this body of water to be the Persian Gulf.

But in the past century, and particularly at times of escalating tensions, there have been efforts to exploit the name of the Persian Gulf as a political tool to foment ethnic division. From colonial interests to Arab interests to Iranian interests, the opening of debate regarding the name of the Persian Gulf has been a recent phenomenon that has been exploited for political gain by all sides. Google should not enable these politicized efforts.

In the 1930s, British adviser to Bahrain Sir Charles Belgrave proposed to rename the Persian Gulf, “Arabian Gulf,” a proposal that was rejected by the British Colonial and Foreign offices. Two decades later, the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company resurrected the term during its dispute with Mohammad Mossadegh, the Iranian Prime Minister whose battle with British oil interests would end in a U.S.-sponsored coup d'état that continues to haunt U.S.-Iran relations. In the 1960s, the title “Arabian Gulf” became central to propaganda efforts during the Pan-Arabism era aimed at exploiting ethnic divisions in the region to unite Arabs against non-Arabs, namely Iranians and Israelis. The term was later employed by Saddam Hussein to justify his aims at territorial expansion. Osama Bin Laden even adopted the phrase in an attempt to rally Arab populations by emphasizing ethnic rivalries in the Middle East.

We have serious concerns that Google is now playing into these efforts of geographic politicization. Unfortunately, this is not the first time Google has stirred controversy on this topic. In 2008, Google Earth began including the term “Arabian Gulf” in addition to Persian Gulf as the name for the body of water. NIAC and others called on you then to stop using this ethnically divisive propaganda term, but to no avail. Instead of following the example of organizations like the National Geographic Society, which in 2004 used term “Arabian Gulf” in its maps but recognized the error and corrected it, Google has apparently decided to allow its informational products to become politicized.

Google should rectify this situation and immediately include the proper name for the Persian Gulf in Google Maps and all of its informational products. The exclusion of the title of the Persian Gulf diminishes your applications as informational tools, and raises questions about the integrity and accuracy of information provided by Google.

We strongly urge you to stay true to Google’s mission – “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful” – without distorting or politicizing that information. We look forward to an explanation from you regarding the recent removal of the Persian Gulf name from Google Maps and call on you to immediately correct this mistake.

Sincerely,

[signature]

Share this with your friends: