Currently Browsing

Posts Tagged ‘ Saeed Jalili ’

  • 8 August 2012
  • Posted By Jessica Schieder
  • 0 Comments
  • NIAC round-up

Iran News Roundup: August 8, 2012

Tensions Rise Over Iranian Hostages
Iran Envoy Casts Syria as Part of Wider Conflict
Regulators irate at NY action against Standard Chartered
Storming British embassy in Iran was not right, says supreme leader
Hush Now, Mitt: A Nuclear Iran Is Not the World’s Greatest Threat
S.Korea to resume buying Iranian crude in Sept –sources
Asia takes record W.Africa oil as buyers shun Iran
Iran preparing for post-Assad era in Syria
Iran To Start First Natural-Gas Storage Facility
Notable Opinion: Israel’s diplomatic scare game

  • 22 September 2009
  • Posted By Matthew Negreanu
  • 0 Comments
  • Events in Iran

Ahmadinejad on his way to NY

Fars News Agency reported on Tuesday that the Iranian President left Iran to attend a UN General Assembly meeting on Wednesday.

Ahmadinejad left Tehran Tuesday morning (local time) to attend the 64th UN General Assembly meeting in New York. A number of high-ranking Iranian officials, including eight lawmakers, are accompanying Ahmadinejad on his 3-day visit to New York. He is due to address the UN General Assembly meeting on its inauguration day along with US President Barack Obama and Libyan President Moammar Gadhafi.

You can find more news of Ahmadinejad’s presence at UN here.

Meanwhile, FNA also reported that:

On Tuesday, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Saeed Jalili once again underlined Tehran’s preparedness to sit at the negotiating table with the six world powers for just and fair talks. “The Islamic Republic of Iran has voiced its preparedness for fair talks based on collective undertakings and commitment to the reinvigoration of global peace, justice and progress,” Jalili said, addressing a formal session of Iran’s Experts Assembly – a top clerical, vetting body selecting the country’s Supreme Leader and supervising his policies and course of action. He further pointed to Tehran’s updated package of proposals for talks with the Group p-5+1 (the five permanent UN Security Council members plus Germany), and added, “Iran presented its package of proposals, which is aimed at constructive interaction and cooperation” for strengthening world peace, justice and progress. Jalili further stated that the October talks will be conducted based on Iran’s proposed package. Elsewhere, Jalili recalled the Islamic Republic of Iran’s undeniable capacities in national, regional and international levels, noting that the world has recognized realities about Iran.

  • 3 September 2009
  • Posted By Matthew Negreanu
  • 0 Comments
  • Events in Iran, Nuclear file, Sanctions, UN

Iran nuke proposal “to be submitted next week”

According to Mehr News Agency, Saeed Jalili, Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator said on Thursday that Iran will submit its updated nuclear proposal to the P5+1 next week. He also confirmed his previous note on Iran’s willingness to resume negotiations with the world powers on the nuclear issue.

Jalili told Iran’s Arabic-language television network al-Alam on Tuesday that “Iran has prepared an updated nuclear proposal and is ready to resume negotiations with the world powers.” Iran’s proposal, Jalili said, could “serve as a basis for talks” with the Western powers. Yet, the European Union’s foreign policy chief Javier Solana said on Wednesday that the West has not received it [Iran’s proposal] and they cannot judge it. “If the document is presented, we will read it and we will be happy to discuss it,” Solana said to the press.  White House spokesman Robert Gibbs made similar comments yesterday morning.

Meanwhile, Iran’s Foreign Ministry Spokesman Hassan Qashqavi said on Thursday that sanctions imposed against Iran over its nuclear program are as ineffective as a ‘rusty sword’.  “The Iranian nation favors interaction and dialogue but will not surrender to pressure,” Qashqavi said, commenting on the West’s move to consider a September deadline for talks with Iran over its nuclear program.

“Sanctions is just a rusty sword which has not any major effect,” IRIB quoted Qashqavi as saying on Wednesday. Qashqavi stressed that Iran is committed to its international responsibilities, but will not give up its nuclear rights.

Sign the Petition

 

7,349 signatures

Tell Google: Stop playing Persian Gulf name games!

May 14, 2012
Larry Page
Chief Executive Officer
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, California 94043

Dear Mr. Page:

It has come to our attention that Google has begun omitting the title of the Persian Gulf from its Google Maps application. This is a disconcerting development given the undisputed historic and geographic precedent of the name Persian Gulf, and the more recent history of opening up the name to political, ethnic, and territorial disputes. However unintentionally, in adopting this practice, Google is participating in a dangerous effort to foment tensions and ethnic divisions in the Middle East by politicizing the region’s geographic nomenclature. Members of the Iranian-American community are overwhelmingly opposed to such efforts, particularly at a time when regional tensions already have been pushed to the brink and threaten to spill over into conflict. As the largest grassroots organization in the Iranian-American community, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) calls on Google to not allow its products to become propaganda tools and to immediately reinstate the historically accurate, apolitical title of “Persian Gulf” in all of its informational products, including Google Maps.

Historically, the name “Persian Gulf” is undisputed. The Greek geographer and astronomer Ptolemy referencing in his writings the “Aquarius Persico.” The Romans referred to the "Mare Persicum." The Arabs historically call the body of water, "Bahr al-Farsia." The legal precedent of this nomenclature is also indisputable, with both the United Nations and the United States Board of Geographic Names confirming the sole legitimacy of the term “Persian Gulf.” Agreement on this matter has also been codified by the signatures of all six bordering Arab countries on United Nations directives declaring this body of water to be the Persian Gulf.

But in the past century, and particularly at times of escalating tensions, there have been efforts to exploit the name of the Persian Gulf as a political tool to foment ethnic division. From colonial interests to Arab interests to Iranian interests, the opening of debate regarding the name of the Persian Gulf has been a recent phenomenon that has been exploited for political gain by all sides. Google should not enable these politicized efforts.

In the 1930s, British adviser to Bahrain Sir Charles Belgrave proposed to rename the Persian Gulf, “Arabian Gulf,” a proposal that was rejected by the British Colonial and Foreign offices. Two decades later, the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company resurrected the term during its dispute with Mohammad Mossadegh, the Iranian Prime Minister whose battle with British oil interests would end in a U.S.-sponsored coup d'état that continues to haunt U.S.-Iran relations. In the 1960s, the title “Arabian Gulf” became central to propaganda efforts during the Pan-Arabism era aimed at exploiting ethnic divisions in the region to unite Arabs against non-Arabs, namely Iranians and Israelis. The term was later employed by Saddam Hussein to justify his aims at territorial expansion. Osama Bin Laden even adopted the phrase in an attempt to rally Arab populations by emphasizing ethnic rivalries in the Middle East.

We have serious concerns that Google is now playing into these efforts of geographic politicization. Unfortunately, this is not the first time Google has stirred controversy on this topic. In 2008, Google Earth began including the term “Arabian Gulf” in addition to Persian Gulf as the name for the body of water. NIAC and others called on you then to stop using this ethnically divisive propaganda term, but to no avail. Instead of following the example of organizations like the National Geographic Society, which in 2004 used term “Arabian Gulf” in its maps but recognized the error and corrected it, Google has apparently decided to allow its informational products to become politicized.

Google should rectify this situation and immediately include the proper name for the Persian Gulf in Google Maps and all of its informational products. The exclusion of the title of the Persian Gulf diminishes your applications as informational tools, and raises questions about the integrity and accuracy of information provided by Google.

We strongly urge you to stay true to Google’s mission – “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful” – without distorting or politicizing that information. We look forward to an explanation from you regarding the recent removal of the Persian Gulf name from Google Maps and call on you to immediately correct this mistake.

Sincerely,

[signature]

Share this with your friends: